Are Covered Call ETFs Safe in a Market Downturn? What Retirees Need to Know
By Adam Hyde — income investing tool builder with 25 years in finance and technology.
Covered call ETFs are among the most popular income tools for retirees — and for good reason. Yields of 8–12% are common, payouts land monthly or weekly, and the strategy sounds inherently defensive. But a question every income investor needs to answer honestly is: what actually happens to these funds when markets drop hard?
This post works through the mechanics, compares how covered call ETFs behaved in past downturns, and tells you what to expect if a bear market hits your portfolio today.
How Covered Call ETFs Are (And Aren’t) Defensive
Covered call ETFs generate income by holding a basket of equities and selling call options against those holdings. The option premiums collected are passed to investors as monthly/weekly distributions. That’s the income engine.
The defensive argument goes like this: premium income provides a cushion. If the fund collects 1% per month in option premiums, a 1% decline in the underlying portfolio is offset. So in a slow, grinding bear market, covered call funds can genuinely outperform pure equity funds on a total return basis.
What they don’t do is eliminate equity risk. If the S&P 500 drops 30%, a covered call ETF on the S&P 500 will also drop — just somewhat less if the fund is constructed properly. The cushion is real but finite. Premiums typically cover 6–10% of annual downside. A crash that exceeds that range hits the Net Asset Value (NAV).
The honest framing: covered call ETFs can be less volatile than their underlying equity exposure, not safe from it.
What Happened During Past Market Downturns
The COVID crash of March 2020 and the 2022 bear market both offer useful data on covered call fund behaviour.
COVID crash (Feb–Mar 2020): The S&P 500 fell approximately 19% peak to trough in five weeks. XYLD — one of the oldest covered call ETFs, writing covered calls on the S&P 500 — fell roughly 24% over the same period. NAV fell harder than the S&P 500 for two months. Distribution income continued uninterrupted throughout, which matters enormously for income-focused retirees. Pro Tip: XYLD does not use a covered call stategy that most analysts would consider modern. Over the last 52 weeks SPYI beat XYLD by approximately 6%, that is 15% total return vs 9%.
2022 bear market (Jan–Dec 2022): The S&P 500 fell around 24%, and the Nasdaq 100 fell over 32%. QYLD (Nasdaq 100 covered calls) dropped approximately 23%. XYLD (S&P 500 covered calls) fell roughly 18%. Partial cushioning — with the broader-market-based fund holding up noticeably better than the tech-heavy one.
The table below compares approximate drawdowns across selected funds during 2022:
| Fund | Underlying Index | Max 2022 Drawdown | S&P 500/Nasdaq Drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|
| XYLD | S&P 500 | ~–18% | ~–24% |
| QYLD | Nasdaq 100 | ~–23% | ~–32% |
| JEPI | S&P 500 (active) | ~–13% | ~–24% |
| PBP | S&P 500 | ~18% | ~–24% |
| HYLD.TO | Multi-sector (CAD) | ~–30% | ~–20% (Currency Adj) |
JEPI’s outperformance in 2022 reflected its more defensive equity selection alongside the covered call overlay — a reminder that the underlying portfolio quality matters as much as the options strategy. HYLD had the largest drawdown because of the funds leverage.
The Distribution Question: Will Income Keep Flowing?
For a retiree, NAV loss is uncomfortable but manageable if the income stream stays intact. The critical question in a downturn is: do distributions get cut?
This is where covered call ETFs have a genuine advantage over traditional dividend ETFs. Option premiums are generated by volatility — and downturns are typically high-volatility environments. When markets fall sharply, implied volatility spikes (think VIX above 30), which means option premiums actually increase. More volatility = more income from the calls being sold.
During the 2022 bear market, most covered call ETFs maintained or even modestly increased their monthly distributions. JEPI’s monthly payouts rose in mid-2022 as volatility spiked. JEPI did not have a single payment in 2022 below their historical average of 40 cents per share. QYLD and XYLD maintained distributions throughout 2020’s crash. This is the structural advantage that makes covered call ETFs particularly compelling for income investors specifically — as opposed to growth investors.
The risk to distributions comes from sustained low-volatility bear markets, which are rare but possible. If the market drifts slowly lower with the VIX stuck at 15 (low volatility), premiums thin out and distributions can compress. This is a less common scenario than a sharp crash, but worth understanding.
NAV Erosion: The Slow Burn Risk
There is a legitimate long-term concern with covered call ETFs that deserves discussion: NAV erosion over time.
When markets trend strongly upward, covered call ETFs lag. The calls sold cap the upside — so in a 25% up year, a covered call fund might only participate in 15%. Over many years of bull markets, the NAV compounds more slowly than the index. This is the fundamental trade-off: you are trading some capital appreciation for reliable current income.
In retirement, this may be exactly the right trade. If you are living off the distributions and have no need to sell the underlying units, the NAV trajectory matters less than the income stream. A fund holding $1M of JEPI paying 8% annually generates $80,000/year whether the NAV is at $56 or $51.
Where NAV erosion becomes genuinely dangerous is for investors who also need to sell units to supplement income — or who plan to draw down capital over time. For this group, a declining NAV combined with regular withdrawals can create a compounding problem, particularly after a prolonged bear market.
Canadian vs. US Covered Call ETFs in a Downturn
Canadian-listed covered call ETFs (primarily from Hamilton, Purpose, and Harvest) tend to have more stable monthly distributions than their US-listed counterparts. This is partly by design — Canadian fund managers typically use smoother distribution policies that avoid large monthly swings.
Several Canadian funds also carry 25% leverage (HDIV.TO, HYLD.TO), which amplifies both the income and the upside or downside. In a 20% equity decline, a 25%-leveraged fund might see its NAV fall 25–26% rather than 20%. The higher yield compensates in normal markets; in a severe downturn it magnifies the loss. Retirees holding leveraged covered call funds should hold sufficient cash or lower-volatility assets to avoid selling units at a depressed NAV.
US-listed funds like JEPI and JEPQ have attracted significant attention for their active management approach — selecting lower-beta equities alongside the covered call overlay. Both funds held up better than passive covered call indexes in 2022.
How to Position Covered Call ETFs in a Retirement Portfolio
The evidence suggests covered call ETFs are well-suited for retirement income but work best as part of a diversified approach:
- Keep 6–18 months of living expenses in cash or short-term bonds. This prevents forced selling during a downturn and lets you wait out a NAV recovery.
- Diversify across underlying exposures — don’t concentrate in Nasdaq-heavy covered call funds. Broad S&P 500, and multi-sector funds have shown better downside control.
- Use registered accounts (TFSA, RRSP, IRA) where possible to avoid annual tax drag on distributions.
- Consider pairing with non-correlated income — energy ETFs, utilities, REITs — to reduce the impact of an equity-driven bear market.
- Avoid over-leveraged positions if capital preservation matters more than maximum yield.
Tips for How to Buy Dependable Income Funds That Are Less Prone to Price (NAV) Erosion
Select funds extremely carefully before you buy them. The best funds tend to have a more conservative covered call strategy which use out of the money calls along with call writing on 50% or less of the fund’s assets.
So… how do you find the best funds?
The Dependable Income Investing App has more than 100 fund reviews scoring funds across 6 factors — including Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets — which produces a single Dependability Score for each. You can dig into what’s behind each score, see how funds perform across 13 dimensions, and run a portfolio income estimate for your own investment size.
FAQ
Q: Do covered call ETFs lose money in a market crash?
A: Yes — their NAV falls when equity markets fall. The covered call strategy provides partial cushioning (typically 6–10% of annual downside protection), but does not eliminate equity market risk. A 30% market crash will still produce a significant NAV decline, even if smaller than the index.
Q: Will covered call ETF distributions get cut in a downturn?
A: Usually not — and they can actually increase. Higher market volatility in a downturn raises option premiums, which is what funds use to pay distributions. During the 2020 COVID crash and the 2022 bear market, most major covered call ETFs maintained their monthly payouts.
Q: Are covered call ETFs safer than dividend ETFs in a bear market?
A: Generally yes, in the short term. Covered call ETFs typically fall less than pure dividend equity funds in a crash, and their distributions are more stable because option premiums rise when volatility spikes — whereas dividend cuts are more common in a severe recession.
Q: What is the biggest risk of holding covered call ETFs in retirement?
A: NAV erosion over a long bull market, combined with the need to draw down capital. If you are both collecting distributions and selling units over time, a declining NAV accelerates the drawdown. Maintaining a cash buffer and not over-withdrawing from the fund itself is the key mitigation.
Q: How do Canadian covered call ETFs compare to US ones in a downturn?
A: Canadian-listed covered call ETFs typically offer more stable, consistent monthly distributions. Funds with leverage (like HDIV.TO and HYLD.TO) amplify downside in a crash. US funds like JEPI and JEPQ use active equity selection to reduce volatility further.
Q: How to buy dependable income funds less prone to NAV Erosion?
A: The Dependable Income Investing App has more than 100 fund reviews scoring funds across 6 factors — including Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets — which produces a single Dependability Score for each. You can dig into what’s behind each score, see how funds perform across 13 dimensions, and run a portfolio income estimate for your own investment size.
Try Dependable Income Investing free
Explore and compare covered call ETFs side by side — including total return, and yield — using our free compare tool.
