BANK.TO vs CALL.TO: Income Fund Comparison

Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund - Canada (BANK.TO) and Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund - Canada (CALL.TO) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.

BANK.TO: MER is approximately 1.92% as per the most recent management report including costs from 25% leverage. Management fee alone is 0.60%. CALL.TO: MER 0.66% per ETF Facts (CALL hedged units). ETF Facts Aug 2025; as of Dec 31 2024 expenses 0.86% including TER 0.20%. BANK.TO fund inception date was Feb 1st 2022 - approximately 4.1 years of history as of review date (rounded up to 5 years for scoring). CALL.TO inception October 12 2017 - over 8 years. Full Dependability and Return scores for both funds are available in the app.

BANK.TO CALL.TO
Fund Name Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund - Canada Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund - Canada
Fund Type Sector Based Fund - Financials Sector Based Fund - Financials
Exchange TSX TSX
Last Reviewed 2026-03-07 2026-02-26
Author , Income Investing Analyst
BANK.TO
CALL.TO
Overall Score
Dependability

🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription

Compare Performance — Free →

Fund Attributes: BANK.TO vs CALL.TO 20% of overall score

Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.

Criterion
BANK.TO
CALL.TO
Expense Ratio
1/5

MER is approximately 1.92% as per the most recent management report including costs from 25% leverage. Management fee alone is 0.60%.

2/5

MER 0.66% per ETF Facts (CALL hedged units). ETF Facts Aug 2025; as of Dec 31 2024 expenses 0.86% including TER 0.20%.

Fund Company Size
4/5

Evolve ETFs has over $8 billion in assets under management as of 2026.

4/5

Evolve over $8 billion in assets under management per About page (Oct 2025 milestone).

Fund History
5/5

Fund inception date was Feb 1st 2022 - approximately 4.1 years of history as of review date (rounded up to 5 years for scoring).

5/5

Inception October 12 2017 - over 8 years.

Fund AUM
4/5

$917.80 Million in assets under management as of recent data. Significantly grown from $344 Million in the previous review - approaching $1 Billion.

1/5

Fund Total Net Assets $145.00 M (all classes) as at Feb 24 2026 per Evolve product page.

Risk: BANK.TO vs CALL.TO 35% of overall score

Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.

Criterion
BANK.TO
CALL.TO
Volatility
5/5

Beta is 0.63 vs SPY (2022-02-11 to 2026-03-06) which is lower than the overall market.

3/5

Beta 1.04 vs SPY (weekly; 2018-01 to 2026-02).

Lower volatility may indicate more stability — important for investors living off their income.
Sector Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Holding across more sectors reduces the impact of any single industry downturn.
Geographic Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Exposure across geographies can reduce risk from any single country's economic conditions.
Fund Risk
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's overall risk profile, based on self-reported classifications where available.
Underlying Assets
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
What the fund actually holds — stocks, bonds, synthetics, or other funds — affects risk profile significantly.

See the full Risk analysis for both BANK.TO and CALL.TO — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.

View Plans →

Return: BANK.TO vs CALL.TO 45% of overall score

Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.

Criterion
BANK.TO
CALL.TO
Yield
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The current dividend yield, reflecting the annual income generated relative to fund price.
Yield Stability
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
How consistent the distribution amounts have been over time — critical for income investors who budget around payments.
Capital History
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's track record of price appreciation or depreciation, reflecting total return alongside income.
Distribution Frequency
4/5

Monthly distributions.

4/5

Monthly distributions.

How often the fund pays distributions — monthly payments are generally preferred by income investors.

See the full Return analysis for both BANK.TO and CALL.TO — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.

View Plans →

Our Review Methodology

Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.

We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?

Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both BANK.TO and CALL.TO are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See our full scoring methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions: BANK.TO vs CALL.TO

Which has a lower expense ratio, BANK.TO or CALL.TO?

BANK.TO: MER is approximately 1.92% as per the most recent management report including costs from 25% leverage. Management fee alone is 0.60%.
CALL.TO: MER 0.66% per ETF Facts (CALL hedged units). ETF Facts Aug 2025; as of Dec 31 2024 expenses 0.86% including TER 0.20%.

Which fund has more assets under management, BANK.TO or CALL.TO?

BANK.TO: $917.80 Million in assets under management as of recent data. Significantly grown from $344 Million in the previous review - approaching $1 Billion.
CALL.TO: Fund Total Net Assets $145.00 M (all classes) as at Feb 24 2026 per Evolve product page.

Which fund has been trading longer, BANK.TO or CALL.TO?

BANK.TO: Fund inception date was Feb 1st 2022 - approximately 4.1 years of history as of review date (rounded up to 5 years for scoring).
CALL.TO: Inception October 12 2017 - over 8 years.

Who manages BANK.TO vs CALL.TO?

BANK.TO: Evolve ETFs has over $8 billion in assets under management as of 2026.
CALL.TO: Evolve over $8 billion in assets under management per About page (Oct 2025 milestone).

Where can I see the full BANK.TO vs CALL.TO comparison with scores?

The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

What is the difference between BANK.TO and CALL.TO?

Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund - Canada is a Sector Based Fund - Financials. MER is approximately 1.92% as per the most recent management report including costs from 25% leverage. Management fee alone is 0.60%. Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund - Canada is a Sector Based Fund - Financials. MER 0.66% per ETF Facts (CALL hedged units). ETF Facts Aug 2025; as of Dec 31 2024 expenses 0.86% including TER 0.20%. Full comparison including Dependability Score is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Which is better for income investors, BANK.TO or CALL.TO?

BANK.TO: MER is approximately 1.92% as per the most recent management report including costs from 25% leverage. Management fee alone is 0.60%. Fund inception date was Feb 1st 2022 - approximately 4.1 years of history as of review date (rounded up to 5 years for scoring). CALL.TO: MER 0.66% per ETF Facts (CALL hedged units). ETF Facts Aug 2025; as of Dec 31 2024 expenses 0.86% including TER 0.20%. Inception October 12 2017 - over 8 years. Which scores higher on Dependability and Return is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Do BANK.TO and CALL.TO pay monthly distributions?

BANK.TO: Monthly distributions. CALL.TO: Monthly distributions. Full yield and distribution stability scores for both funds are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See the Full BANK.TO vs CALL.TO Comparison

The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.

Open Free Comparison Tool →

Free. No credit card required.

"As someone new to investing, this app is a game changer!"

— J. Cook, Alert Bay, BC 🇨🇦

"It is a great tool for tracking investing. It has been incredibly helpful for my husband and me."

— R. Savino, Brea, CA 🇺🇸

"I imagine it will continue to be invaluable as I begin personally managing some or all of my investments."

— D. Giesy, Mount Vernon, WA 🇺🇸