GPIQ vs QQQI: Income Fund Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF - US (GPIQ) and NEOS Nasdaq-100® High Income ETF - US (QQQI) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.
Also see: GPIQ individual review · QQQI individual review
GPIQ: Gross expense ratio is 0.35 - quite low. QQQI: Management fee and total annual fund operating expenses are 0.68%. GPIQ fund inception date was Oct 24 2023. QQQI fund inception date was Jan 30th 2024 - just over 2 years of history as of review date. Full Dependability and Return scores for both funds are available in the app.
| GPIQ | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF - US | NEOS Nasdaq-100® High Income ETF - US |
| Fund Type | Index Based Fund | Index Based Fund |
| Exchange | NYSE/NASDAQ | NYSE/NASDAQ |
| Last Reviewed | 2025-12-09 | 2026-03-07 |
| Author | Adam Hyde, Income Investing Analyst | |
🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription
Compare Performance — Free →Fund Attributes: GPIQ vs QQQI 20% of overall score
Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.
Gross expense ratio is 0.35 - quite low.
Management fee and total annual fund operating expenses are 0.68%.
Goldman Sachs manages nearly 3 trillion in assets.
NEOS Investments total ETF AUM is approximately $21.6 billion across all 19 funds as of 03/05/2026.
Fund inception date was Oct 24 2023.
Fund inception date was Jan 30th 2024 - just over 2 years of history as of review date.
Fund has about 2.3 billion under management.
$9.015 Billion in assets under management as of March 2026. One of the largest NEOS funds.
Risk: GPIQ vs QQQI 35% of overall score
Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.
Beta is 0.98 for this fund which is medium volatility.
Beta is 0.98 vs SPY (2024-02-09 to 2026-03-06) - slightly below the market. Short fund history limits precision of this calculation.
See the full Risk analysis for both GPIQ and QQQI — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.
View Plans →Return: GPIQ vs QQQI 45% of overall score
Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.
The fund pays monthly distributions.
Monthly distributions.
See the full Return analysis for both GPIQ and QQQI — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.
View Plans →Our Review Methodology
Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.
We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?
Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both GPIQ and QQQI are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
See our full scoring methodology →
Frequently Asked Questions: GPIQ vs QQQI
Which has a lower expense ratio, GPIQ or QQQI?
GPIQ: Gross expense ratio is 0.35 - quite low.
QQQI: Management fee and total annual fund operating expenses are 0.68%.
Which fund has more assets under management, GPIQ or QQQI?
GPIQ: Fund has about 2.3 billion under management.
QQQI: $9.015 Billion in assets under management as of March 2026. One of the largest NEOS funds.
Which fund has been trading longer, GPIQ or QQQI?
GPIQ: Fund inception date was Oct 24 2023.
QQQI: Fund inception date was Jan 30th 2024 - just over 2 years of history as of review date.
Who manages GPIQ vs QQQI?
GPIQ: Goldman Sachs manages nearly 3 trillion in assets.
QQQI: NEOS Investments total ETF AUM is approximately $21.6 billion across all 19 funds as of 03/05/2026.
Where can I see the full GPIQ vs QQQI comparison with scores?
The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
What is the difference between GPIQ and QQQI?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Gross expense ratio is 0.35 - quite low. NEOS Nasdaq-100® High Income ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Management fee and total annual fund operating expenses are 0.68%. Full comparison including Dependability Score is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
Which is better for income investors, GPIQ or QQQI?
GPIQ: Gross expense ratio is 0.35 - quite low. Fund inception date was Oct 24 2023. QQQI: Management fee and total annual fund operating expenses are 0.68%. Fund inception date was Jan 30th 2024 - just over 2 years of history as of review date. Which scores higher on Dependability and Return is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
Do GPIQ and QQQI pay monthly distributions?
GPIQ: The fund pays monthly distributions. QQQI: Monthly distributions. Full yield and distribution stability scores for both funds are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
See the Full GPIQ vs QQQI Comparison
The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.
Open Free Comparison Tool →Free. No credit card required.