GPIX vs BALI: Income Fund Comparison

Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF - US (GPIX) and iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF - US (BALI) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.

GPIX: Gross expense ratio is 0.35 - quite low. BALI: Net expense ratio is 0.35%. GPIX fund inception date was Oct 24 2023. BALI fund inception date was September 26 2023 - approximately 2 years and 5 months old as of review date. Full Dependability and Return scores for both funds are available in the app.

GPIX BALI
Fund Name Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF - US iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF - US
Fund Type Index Based Fund Diversified Fund
Exchange NYSE/NASDAQ NYSE/NASDAQ
Last Reviewed 2025-12-09 2026-03-06
Author , Income Investing Analyst
GPIX
BALI
Overall Score
Dependability

🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription

Compare Performance — Free →

Fund Attributes: GPIX vs BALI 20% of overall score

Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.

Criterion
GPIX
BALI
Expense Ratio
4/5

Gross expense ratio is 0.35 - quite low.

4/5

Net expense ratio is 0.35%.

Fund Company Size
5/5

Goldman Sachs manages nearly 3 trillion in assets.

5/5

BlackRock reported $14 trillion in AUM for full year 2025 - world's largest asset manager.

Fund History
3/5

Fund inception date was Oct 24 2023.

3/5

Fund inception date was September 26 2023 - approximately 2 years and 5 months old as of review date.

Fund AUM
5/5

Fund has about 2.4 Billion under management.

4/5

Fund net assets are approximately $843 million per iShares product page.

Risk: GPIX vs BALI 35% of overall score

Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.

Criterion
GPIX
BALI
Volatility
4/5

Beta is 0.86 for this fund which is better than the average market.

4/5

Beta is 0.87 vs SPY over the period 2023-10-06 to 2026-03-06 (fund history). Standalone annualized volatility is 12.64% from weekly total return data series - low-to-moderate. Both beta and standalone volatility score at 4.

Lower volatility may indicate more stability — important for investors living off their income.
Sector Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Holding across more sectors reduces the impact of any single industry downturn.
Geographic Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Exposure across geographies can reduce risk from any single country's economic conditions.
Fund Risk
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's overall risk profile, based on self-reported classifications where available.
Underlying Assets
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
What the fund actually holds — stocks, bonds, synthetics, or other funds — affects risk profile significantly.

See the full Risk analysis for both GPIX and BALI — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.

View Plans →

Return: GPIX vs BALI 45% of overall score

Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.

Criterion
GPIX
BALI
Yield
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The current dividend yield, reflecting the annual income generated relative to fund price.
Yield Stability
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
How consistent the distribution amounts have been over time — critical for income investors who budget around payments.
Capital History
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's track record of price appreciation or depreciation, reflecting total return alongside income.
Distribution Frequency
4/5

The fund pays monthly distributions.

4/5

Fund pays monthly distributions - confirmed from 29 payments in data series since inception in September 2023.

How often the fund pays distributions — monthly payments are generally preferred by income investors.

See the full Return analysis for both GPIX and BALI — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.

View Plans →

Our Review Methodology

Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.

We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?

Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both GPIX and BALI are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See our full scoring methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions: GPIX vs BALI

Which has a lower expense ratio, GPIX or BALI?

GPIX: Gross expense ratio is 0.35 - quite low.
BALI: Net expense ratio is 0.35%.

Which fund has more assets under management, GPIX or BALI?

GPIX: Fund has about 2.4 Billion under management.
BALI: Fund net assets are approximately $843 million per iShares product page.

Which fund has been trading longer, GPIX or BALI?

GPIX: Fund inception date was Oct 24 2023.
BALI: Fund inception date was September 26 2023 - approximately 2 years and 5 months old as of review date.

Who manages GPIX vs BALI?

GPIX: Goldman Sachs manages nearly 3 trillion in assets.
BALI: BlackRock reported $14 trillion in AUM for full year 2025 - world's largest asset manager.

Where can I see the full GPIX vs BALI comparison with scores?

The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

What is the difference between GPIX and BALI?

Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Gross expense ratio is 0.35 - quite low. iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF - US is a Diversified Fund. Net expense ratio is 0.35%. Full comparison including Dependability Score is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Which is better for income investors, GPIX or BALI?

GPIX: Gross expense ratio is 0.35 - quite low. Fund inception date was Oct 24 2023. BALI: Net expense ratio is 0.35%. Fund inception date was September 26 2023 - approximately 2 years and 5 months old as of review date. Which scores higher on Dependability and Return is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Do GPIX and BALI pay monthly distributions?

GPIX: The fund pays monthly distributions. BALI: Fund pays monthly distributions - confirmed from 29 payments in data series since inception in September 2023. Full yield and distribution stability scores for both funds are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See the Full GPIX vs BALI Comparison

The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.

Open Free Comparison Tool →

Free. No credit card required.

"As someone new to investing, this app is a game changer!"

— J. Cook, Alert Bay, BC 🇨🇦

"It is a great tool for tracking investing. It has been incredibly helpful for my husband and me."

— R. Savino, Brea, CA 🇺🇸

"I imagine it will continue to be invaluable as I begin personally managing some or all of my investments."

— D. Giesy, Mount Vernon, WA 🇺🇸