GPIX vs FEPI: Income Fund Comparison

Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF - US (GPIX) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF - US (FEPI) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.

GPIX: Gross expense ratio is 0.35 - quite low. FEPI: Total expense ratio is 0.65%. GPIX fund inception date was Oct 24 2023. FEPI inception date was October 11 2023. As of March 6 2026 the fund is approximately 2 years and 4 months old. Full Dependability and Return scores for both funds are available in the app.

GPIX FEPI
Fund Name Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF - US REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF - US
Fund Type Index Based Fund Sector Based Fund - Information Technology
Exchange NYSE/NASDAQ NYSE/NASDAQ
Last Reviewed 2025-12-09 2026-03-06
Author , Income Investing Analyst
GPIX
FEPI
Overall Score
Dependability

🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription

Compare Performance — Free →

Fund Attributes: GPIX vs FEPI 20% of overall score

Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.

Criterion
GPIX
FEPI
Expense Ratio
4/5

Gross expense ratio is 0.35 - quite low.

3/5

Total expense ratio is 0.65%.

Fund Company Size
5/5

Goldman Sachs manages nearly 3 trillion in assets.

5/5

Over $10 billion in assets under management for Rex Financial.

Fund History
3/5

Fund inception date was Oct 24 2023.

3/5

Inception date was October 11 2023. As of March 6 2026 the fund is approximately 2 years and 4 months old.

Fund AUM
5/5

Fund has about 2.4 Billion under management.

3/5

Fund AUM is approximately $591.6 million as of March 4 2026.

Risk: GPIX vs FEPI 35% of overall score

Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.

Criterion
GPIX
FEPI
Volatility
4/5

Beta is 0.86 for this fund which is better than the average market.

3/5

Beta is 1.12 vs SPY over the available price series (October 2023 to March 2026). Standalone annualized volatility is 21.39% (weekly total returns). Both measures score 3.

Lower volatility may indicate more stability — important for investors living off their income.
Sector Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Holding across more sectors reduces the impact of any single industry downturn.
Geographic Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Exposure across geographies can reduce risk from any single country's economic conditions.
Fund Risk
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's overall risk profile, based on self-reported classifications where available.
Underlying Assets
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
What the fund actually holds — stocks, bonds, synthetics, or other funds — affects risk profile significantly.

See the full Risk analysis for both GPIX and FEPI — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.

View Plans →

Return: GPIX vs FEPI 45% of overall score

Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.

Criterion
GPIX
FEPI
Yield
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The current dividend yield, reflecting the annual income generated relative to fund price.
Yield Stability
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
How consistent the distribution amounts have been over time — critical for income investors who budget around payments.
Capital History
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's track record of price appreciation or depreciation, reflecting total return alongside income.
Distribution Frequency
4/5

The fund pays monthly distributions.

4/5

Fund pays monthly distributions.

How often the fund pays distributions — monthly payments are generally preferred by income investors.

See the full Return analysis for both GPIX and FEPI — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.

View Plans →

Our Review Methodology

Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.

We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?

Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both GPIX and FEPI are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See our full scoring methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions: GPIX vs FEPI

Which has a lower expense ratio, GPIX or FEPI?

GPIX: Gross expense ratio is 0.35 - quite low.
FEPI: Total expense ratio is 0.65%.

Which fund has more assets under management, GPIX or FEPI?

GPIX: Fund has about 2.4 Billion under management.
FEPI: Fund AUM is approximately $591.6 million as of March 4 2026.

Which fund has been trading longer, GPIX or FEPI?

GPIX: Fund inception date was Oct 24 2023.
FEPI: Inception date was October 11 2023. As of March 6 2026 the fund is approximately 2 years and 4 months old.

Who manages GPIX vs FEPI?

GPIX: Goldman Sachs manages nearly 3 trillion in assets.
FEPI: Over $10 billion in assets under management for Rex Financial.

Where can I see the full GPIX vs FEPI comparison with scores?

The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

What is the difference between GPIX and FEPI?

Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Gross expense ratio is 0.35 - quite low. REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF - US is a Sector Based Fund - Information Technology. Total expense ratio is 0.65%. Full comparison including Dependability Score is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Which is better for income investors, GPIX or FEPI?

GPIX: Gross expense ratio is 0.35 - quite low. Fund inception date was Oct 24 2023. FEPI: Total expense ratio is 0.65%. Inception date was October 11 2023. As of March 6 2026 the fund is approximately 2 years and 4 months old. Which scores higher on Dependability and Return is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Do GPIX and FEPI pay monthly distributions?

GPIX: The fund pays monthly distributions. FEPI: Fund pays monthly distributions. Full yield and distribution stability scores for both funds are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See the Full GPIX vs FEPI Comparison

The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.

Open Free Comparison Tool →

Free. No credit card required.

"As someone new to investing, this app is a game changer!"

— J. Cook, Alert Bay, BC 🇨🇦

"It is a great tool for tracking investing. It has been incredibly helpful for my husband and me."

— R. Savino, Brea, CA 🇺🇸

"I imagine it will continue to be invaluable as I begin personally managing some or all of my investments."

— D. Giesy, Mount Vernon, WA 🇺🇸