HUTL.TO vs ENCC.TO: Income Fund Comparison

Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF - Canada (HUTL.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF - Canada (ENCC.TO) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.

HUTL.TO ENCC.TO
Fund Name Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF - Canada Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF - Canada
Fund Type Sector Based Fund - Utilities Sector Based Fund - Energy
Exchange TSX TSX
Last Reviewed 2025-07-30 2025-12-24
HUTL.TO
ENCC.TO
Overall Score
Dependability

🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription

Compare Performance — Free →

Fund Attributes: HUTL.TO vs ENCC.TO 20% of overall score

Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.

Criterion
HUTL.TO
ENCC.TO
Expense Ratio
3/5

Management expense ratio is 0.68%.

2/5

MER is 0.76% which is on the higher side.

Fund Company Size
4/5

Harvest has over $7 billion in assets under management.

5/5

Mirae Asset Global Investments - a South Korean financial services company - manages over US$200 billion in assets worldwide.

Fund History
5/5

Inception date was Jan 15 2019.

5/5

Fund started April 11th 2011.

Fund AUM
3/5

About $340 million in assets under management.

4/5

900 Million in ENCC.TO and ENCL.TO which are effectively the same fund.

Risk: HUTL.TO vs ENCC.TO 35% of overall score

Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.

Criterion
HUTL.TO
ENCC.TO
Volatility
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Lower volatility may indicate more stability — important for investors living off their income.
Sector Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Holding across more sectors reduces the impact of any single industry downturn.
Geographic Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Exposure across geographies can reduce risk from any single country's economic conditions.
Fund Risk
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's overall risk profile, based on self-reported classifications where available.
Underlying Assets
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
What the fund actually holds — stocks, bonds, synthetics, or other funds — affects risk profile significantly.

See the full Risk analysis for both HUTL.TO and ENCC.TO — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.

View Plans →

Return: HUTL.TO vs ENCC.TO 45% of overall score

Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.

Criterion
HUTL.TO
ENCC.TO
Yield
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The current dividend yield, reflecting the annual income generated relative to fund price.
Yield Stability
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
How consistent the distribution amounts have been over time — critical for income investors who budget around payments.
Capital History
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's track record of price appreciation or depreciation, reflecting total return alongside income.
Distribution Frequency
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
How often the fund pays distributions — monthly payments are generally preferred by income investors.

See the full Return analysis for both HUTL.TO and ENCC.TO — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.

View Plans →

Our Review Methodology

Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.

We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?

Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both HUTL.TO and ENCC.TO are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Frequently Asked Questions: HUTL.TO vs ENCC.TO

Which has a lower expense ratio, HUTL.TO or ENCC.TO?

HUTL.TO: Management expense ratio is 0.68%.
ENCC.TO: MER is 0.76% which is on the higher side.

Which fund has more assets under management, HUTL.TO or ENCC.TO?

HUTL.TO: About $340 million in assets under management.
ENCC.TO: 900 Million in ENCC.TO and ENCL.TO which are effectively the same fund.

Which fund has been trading longer, HUTL.TO or ENCC.TO?

HUTL.TO: Inception date was Jan 15 2019.
ENCC.TO: Fund started April 11th 2011.

Who manages HUTL.TO vs ENCC.TO?

HUTL.TO: Harvest has over $7 billion in assets under management.
ENCC.TO: Mirae Asset Global Investments - a South Korean financial services company - manages over US$200 billion in assets worldwide.

Where can I see the full HUTL.TO vs ENCC.TO comparison with scores?

The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See the Full HUTL.TO vs ENCC.TO Comparison

The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.

Open Free Comparison Tool →

Free. No credit card required.

"As someone new to investing, this app is a game changer!"

— J. Cook, Alert Bay, BC 🇨🇦

"It is a great tool for tracking investing. It has been incredibly helpful for my husband and me."

— R. Savino, Brea, CA 🇺🇸

"I imagine it will continue to be invaluable as I begin personally managing some or all of my investments."

— D. Giesy, Mount Vernon, WA 🇺🇸