HUTL.TO vs HUTE.TO: Income Fund Comparison
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF - Canada (HUTL.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF - Canada (HUTE.TO) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.
Also see: HUTL.TO individual review · HUTE.TO individual review
HUTL.TO: Management expense ratio is 0.68%. HUTE.TO: Management expense ratio is 2.25% - high due to the leverage costs. HUTL.TO inception date was Jan 15 2019. HUTE.TO inception date was October 25 2022. Full Dependability and Return scores for both funds are available in the app.
| HUTL.TO | HUTE.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF - Canada | Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF - Canada |
| Fund Type | Sector Based Fund - Utilities | Sector Based Fund - Utilities |
| Exchange | TSX | TSX |
| Last Reviewed | 2025-07-30 | 2025-07-30 |
| Author | Adam Hyde, Income Investing Analyst | |
🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription
Compare Performance — Free →Fund Attributes: HUTL.TO vs HUTE.TO 20% of overall score
Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.
Management expense ratio is 0.68%.
Management expense ratio is 2.25% - high due to the leverage costs.
Harvest has over $7 billion in assets under management.
Harvest has over $7 billion in assets under management.
Inception date was Jan 15 2019.
Inception date was October 25 2022.
About $340 million in assets under management.
About $50 million in assets under management - a small fund.
Risk: HUTL.TO vs HUTE.TO 35% of overall score
Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.
According to portfolio visualizer the beta of the fund is 0.49 which is low volatility.
According to portfolio visualizer the beta of the fund is 0.4 which is low volatility.
See the full Risk analysis for both HUTL.TO and HUTE.TO — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.
View Plans →Return: HUTL.TO vs HUTE.TO 45% of overall score
Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.
Pays monthly.
Pays monthly.
See the full Return analysis for both HUTL.TO and HUTE.TO — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.
View Plans →Our Review Methodology
Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.
We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?
Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both HUTL.TO and HUTE.TO are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
See our full scoring methodology →
Frequently Asked Questions: HUTL.TO vs HUTE.TO
Which has a lower expense ratio, HUTL.TO or HUTE.TO?
HUTL.TO: Management expense ratio is 0.68%.
HUTE.TO: Management expense ratio is 2.25% - high due to the leverage costs.
Which fund has more assets under management, HUTL.TO or HUTE.TO?
HUTL.TO: About $340 million in assets under management.
HUTE.TO: About $50 million in assets under management - a small fund.
Which fund has been trading longer, HUTL.TO or HUTE.TO?
HUTL.TO: Inception date was Jan 15 2019.
HUTE.TO: Inception date was October 25 2022.
Who manages HUTL.TO vs HUTE.TO?
HUTL.TO: Harvest has over $7 billion in assets under management.
HUTE.TO: Harvest has over $7 billion in assets under management.
Where can I see the full HUTL.TO vs HUTE.TO comparison with scores?
The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
What is the difference between HUTL.TO and HUTE.TO?
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF - Canada is a Sector Based Fund - Utilities. Management expense ratio is 0.68%. Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF - Canada is a Sector Based Fund - Utilities. Management expense ratio is 2.25% - high due to the leverage costs. Full comparison including Dependability Score is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
Which is better for income investors, HUTL.TO or HUTE.TO?
HUTL.TO: Management expense ratio is 0.68%. Inception date was Jan 15 2019. HUTE.TO: Management expense ratio is 2.25% - high due to the leverage costs. Inception date was October 25 2022. Which scores higher on Dependability and Return is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
Do HUTL.TO and HUTE.TO pay monthly distributions?
HUTL.TO: Pays monthly. HUTE.TO: Pays monthly. Full yield and distribution stability scores for both funds are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
See the Full HUTL.TO vs HUTE.TO Comparison
The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.
Open Free Comparison Tool →Free. No credit card required.