IQQQ vs QDTE: Income Fund Comparison
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF - US (IQQQ) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF - US (QDTE) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.
Also see: IQQQ individual review · QDTE individual review
IQQQ: Expense ratio is 0.55% as listed on the fund product page snapshot dated 8/14/2026. QDTE: Gross expense ratio is 0.97% per the fund's official Fund Details table. IQQQ fund inception was 3/18/2024; as of the 8/15/2026 review date the fund is about 2.4 years old which rounds up to 3 years. QDTE fund launched March 7 2024 - about 2.4 years old as of this review - rounds up to 3 years. Full Dependability and Return scores for both funds are available in the app.
| IQQQ | QDTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF - US | Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF - US |
| Fund Type | Index Based Fund | Index Based Fund |
| Exchange | NYSE/NASDAQ | NYSE/NASDAQ |
| Last Reviewed | Aug 16, 2026 | Aug 17, 2026 |
| Author | Adam Hyde, Income Investing Analyst | |
🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription
Compare Performance — Free →Fund Attributes: IQQQ vs QDTE 20% of overall score
Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.
Expense ratio is 0.55% as listed on the fund product page snapshot dated 8/14/2026.
Gross expense ratio is 0.97% per the fund's official Fund Details table.
ProShares states on its homepage that it offers one of the largest ETF lineups with over $105 billion in assets.
Roundhill Investments surpassed $30 billion in total firm-wide AUM as of June 26 2026 per its official press release.
Fund inception was 3/18/2024; as of the 8/15/2026 review date the fund is about 2.4 years old which rounds up to 3 years.
Fund launched March 7 2024 - about 2.4 years old as of this review - rounds up to 3 years.
Net assets are about $414.9 million per the fund product page snapshot dated 8/14/2026.
Fund AUM is $975.05 million per the fund's official Fund Details table.
Risk: IQQQ vs QDTE 35% of overall score
Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.
Beta vs SPY is 1.13 over the fund's available price history (2024-03-28 to 2026-08-15) - moderate market sensitivity. Standalone volatility from the price series is 18.27% annualized (weekly total returns) - low-to-moderate choppiness. Beta score (3) and standalone volatility score (4) are within 1 point so the beta score is used as the final rating per the combination rule.
Beta vs SPY is 1.11 (period 2024-03-15 to 2026-08-15 - the fund's available history) - moderate market sensitivity. Standalone volatility from the price series is 17.97% annualized (weekly total returns) - low-to-moderate choppiness. Beta score (3) used as primary driver since standalone vol score (4) differs by only 1 point.
See the full Risk analysis for both IQQQ and QDTE — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.
View Plans →Return: IQQQ vs QDTE 45% of overall score
Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.
The fund's distribution history table shows one payment per month for each of the last 7 consecutive months (February through August 2026) confirming a monthly cadence.
Distribution history confirms weekly payment dates throughout 2024 - 2025 and 2026.
See the full Return analysis for both IQQQ and QDTE — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.
View Plans →Our Review Methodology
Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.
We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?
Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both IQQQ and QDTE are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
See our full scoring methodology →
Frequently Asked Questions: IQQQ vs QDTE
Which has a lower expense ratio, IQQQ or QDTE?
IQQQ: Expense ratio is 0.55% as listed on the fund product page snapshot dated 8/14/2026.
QDTE: Gross expense ratio is 0.97% per the fund's official Fund Details table.
Which fund has more assets under management, IQQQ or QDTE?
IQQQ: Net assets are about $414.9 million per the fund product page snapshot dated 8/14/2026.
QDTE: Fund AUM is $975.05 million per the fund's official Fund Details table.
Which fund has been trading longer, IQQQ or QDTE?
IQQQ: Fund inception was 3/18/2024; as of the 8/15/2026 review date the fund is about 2.4 years old which rounds up to 3 years.
QDTE: Fund launched March 7 2024 - about 2.4 years old as of this review - rounds up to 3 years.
Who manages IQQQ vs QDTE?
IQQQ: ProShares states on its homepage that it offers one of the largest ETF lineups with over $105 billion in assets.
QDTE: Roundhill Investments surpassed $30 billion in total firm-wide AUM as of June 26 2026 per its official press release.
Where can I see the full IQQQ vs QDTE comparison with scores?
The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
What is the difference between IQQQ and QDTE?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Expense ratio is 0.55% as listed on the fund product page snapshot dated 8/14/2026. Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Gross expense ratio is 0.97% per the fund's official Fund Details table. Full comparison including Dependability Score is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
Which is better for income investors, IQQQ or QDTE?
IQQQ: Expense ratio is 0.55% as listed on the fund product page snapshot dated 8/14/2026. Fund inception was 3/18/2024; as of the 8/15/2026 review date the fund is about 2.4 years old which rounds up to 3 years. QDTE: Gross expense ratio is 0.97% per the fund's official Fund Details table. Fund launched March 7 2024 - about 2.4 years old as of this review - rounds up to 3 years. Which scores higher on Dependability and Return is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
Do IQQQ and QDTE pay monthly distributions?
IQQQ: The fund's distribution history table shows one payment per month for each of the last 7 consecutive months (February through August 2026) confirming a monthly cadence. QDTE: Distribution history confirms weekly payment dates throughout 2024 - 2025 and 2026. Full yield and distribution stability scores for both funds are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
See the Full IQQQ vs QDTE Comparison
The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.
Open Free Comparison Tool →Free. No credit card required.