IWMI vs IWMY: Income Fund Comparison

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF - US (IWMI) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF - US (IWMY) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.

IWMI: Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses are 0.78% (management fee 0.68% contractually capped through September 2026 plus acquired fund fees and expenses of 0.10% from holding VTWO) as of March 2026. IWMY: Expense ratio is 1.05% which is high. Increased from 1.02% in the previous review. IWMI fund inception June 24 2024. Approximately 1.7 years old as of review date - less than 2 years. IWMY fund inception date was Oct 30th 2023 - approximately 2.3 years of history as of review date. In early October 2024 the fund moved from monthly to weekly distributions. Full Dependability and Return scores for both funds are available in the app.

IWMI IWMY
Fund Name NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF - US Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF - US
Fund Type Index Based Fund Index Based Fund
Exchange NYSE/NASDAQ NYSE/NASDAQ
Last Reviewed 2026-03-16 2026-03-10
Author , Income Investing Analyst
IWMI
IWMY
Overall Score
Dependability

🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription

Compare Performance — Free →

Fund Attributes: IWMI vs IWMY 20% of overall score

Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.

Criterion
IWMI
IWMY
Expense Ratio
2/5

Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses are 0.78% (management fee 0.68% contractually capped through September 2026 plus acquired fund fees and expenses of 0.10% from holding VTWO) as of March 2026.

1/5

Expense ratio is 1.05% which is high. Increased from 1.02% in the previous review.

Fund Company Size
5/5

NEOS Investments manages approximately $20 billion in assets across 19 ETFs as of early 2026.

4/5

Defiance ETFs surpassed $8 Billion in assets under management as of January 2026.

Fund History
2/5

Fund inception June 24 2024. Approximately 1.7 years old as of review date - less than 2 years.

3/5

Fund inception date was Oct 30th 2023 - approximately 2.3 years of history as of review date. In early October 2024 the fund moved from monthly to weekly distributions.

Fund AUM
4/5

Net assets $649.85 million as of March 13 2026 per the fund page.

1/5

$100.32 Million in assets under management which is a very small fund. Fund has shrunk from $113 Million in the previous review - likely due to poor performance.

Risk: IWMI vs IWMY 35% of overall score

Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.

Criterion
IWMI
IWMY
Volatility
4/5

Beta 0.88 vs SPY (weekly; July 2024 to March 2026) - in the 0.80-0.99 range. Standalone volatility 16.86% annualized (weekly total returns per data series) - low-to-moderate. Both metrics support score 4.

1/5

Beta vs SPY is approximately -0.16 (2023-11-10 to 2026-03-06) - very low market correlation. Per scoring rules - standalone volatility is used when |beta| < 0.6. Standalone annualized volatility (weekly total returns) is approximately 116.19% - extremely high price choppiness independent of market movements. Combined with severe NAV erosion of approximately -68.61% since inception.

Lower volatility may indicate more stability — important for investors living off their income.
Sector Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Holding across more sectors reduces the impact of any single industry downturn.
Geographic Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Exposure across geographies can reduce risk from any single country's economic conditions.
Fund Risk
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's overall risk profile, based on self-reported classifications where available.
Underlying Assets
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
What the fund actually holds — stocks, bonds, synthetics, or other funds — affects risk profile significantly.

See the full Risk analysis for both IWMI and IWMY — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.

View Plans →

Return: IWMI vs IWMY 45% of overall score

Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.

Criterion
IWMI
IWMY
Yield
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The current dividend yield, reflecting the annual income generated relative to fund price.
Yield Stability
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
How consistent the distribution amounts have been over time — critical for income investors who budget around payments.
Capital History
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's track record of price appreciation or depreciation, reflecting total return alongside income.
Distribution Frequency
4/5

The fund pays distributions monthly confirmed from distribution history showing consistent monthly payments since June 2024.

5/5

Weekly distributions (moved from monthly in early October 2024).

How often the fund pays distributions — monthly payments are generally preferred by income investors.

See the full Return analysis for both IWMI and IWMY — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.

View Plans →

Our Review Methodology

Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.

We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?

Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both IWMI and IWMY are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See our full scoring methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions: IWMI vs IWMY

Which has a lower expense ratio, IWMI or IWMY?

IWMI: Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses are 0.78% (management fee 0.68% contractually capped through September 2026 plus acquired fund fees and expenses of 0.10% from holding VTWO) as of March 2026.
IWMY: Expense ratio is 1.05% which is high. Increased from 1.02% in the previous review.

Which fund has more assets under management, IWMI or IWMY?

IWMI: Net assets $649.85 million as of March 13 2026 per the fund page.
IWMY: $100.32 Million in assets under management which is a very small fund. Fund has shrunk from $113 Million in the previous review - likely due to poor performance.

Which fund has been trading longer, IWMI or IWMY?

IWMI: Fund inception June 24 2024. Approximately 1.7 years old as of review date - less than 2 years.
IWMY: Fund inception date was Oct 30th 2023 - approximately 2.3 years of history as of review date. In early October 2024 the fund moved from monthly to weekly distributions.

Who manages IWMI vs IWMY?

IWMI: NEOS Investments manages approximately $20 billion in assets across 19 ETFs as of early 2026.
IWMY: Defiance ETFs surpassed $8 Billion in assets under management as of January 2026.

Where can I see the full IWMI vs IWMY comparison with scores?

The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

What is the difference between IWMI and IWMY?

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses are 0.78% (management fee 0.68% contractually capped through September 2026 plus acquired fund fees and expenses of 0.10% from holding VTWO) as of March 2026. Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Expense ratio is 1.05% which is high. Increased from 1.02% in the previous review. Full comparison including Dependability Score is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Which is better for income investors, IWMI or IWMY?

IWMI: Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses are 0.78% (management fee 0.68% contractually capped through September 2026 plus acquired fund fees and expenses of 0.10% from holding VTWO) as of March 2026. Fund inception June 24 2024. Approximately 1.7 years old as of review date - less than 2 years. IWMY: Expense ratio is 1.05% which is high. Increased from 1.02% in the previous review. Fund inception date was Oct 30th 2023 - approximately 2.3 years of history as of review date. In early October 2024 the fund moved from monthly to weekly distributions. Which scores higher on Dependability and Return is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Do IWMI and IWMY pay monthly distributions?

IWMI: The fund pays distributions monthly confirmed from distribution history showing consistent monthly payments since June 2024. IWMY: Weekly distributions (moved from monthly in early October 2024). Full yield and distribution stability scores for both funds are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See the Full IWMI vs IWMY Comparison

The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.

Open Free Comparison Tool →

Free. No credit card required.

"As someone new to investing, this app is a game changer!"

— J. Cook, Alert Bay, BC 🇨🇦

"It is a great tool for tracking investing. It has been incredibly helpful for my husband and me."

— R. Savino, Brea, CA 🇺🇸

"I imagine it will continue to be invaluable as I begin personally managing some or all of my investments."

— D. Giesy, Mount Vernon, WA 🇺🇸