IWMY vs RYLD: Income Fund Comparison

Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF - US (IWMY) and GlobalX Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF - US (RYLD) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.

IWMY RYLD
Fund Name Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF - US GlobalX Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF - US
Fund Type Index Based Fund Index Based Fund
Exchange NYSE/NASDAQ NYSE/NASDAQ
Last Reviewed not treasuries." 2026-03-06
IWMY
RYLD
Overall Score
Dependability

🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription

Compare Performance — Free →

Fund Attributes: IWMY vs RYLD 20% of overall score

Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.

Criterion
IWMY
RYLD
Expense Ratio
1/5

Expense ratio is 1.05% which is high. Increased from 1.02% in the previous review.

3/5

Total expense ratio is 0.60% which is reasonable for a covered call ETF.

Fund Company Size
4/5

Defiance ETFs surpassed $8 Billion in assets under management as of January 2026.

5/5

Mirae Asset Global Investments - a South Korean financial services company - manages over $632 billion in assets worldwide.

Fund History
3/5

Fund inception date was Oct 30th 2023 - approximately 2.3 years of history as of review date. In early October 2024 the fund moved from monthly to weekly distributions.

5/5

Fund inception date was April 17th 2019 - over 6 years of history as of review date.

Fund AUM
1/5

$100.32 Million in assets under management which is a very small fund. Fund has shrunk from $113 Million in the previous review - likely due to poor performance.

5/5

$1.30 Billion in assets under management as of March 2026.

Risk: IWMY vs RYLD 35% of overall score

Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.

Criterion
IWMY
RYLD
Volatility
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Lower volatility may indicate more stability — important for investors living off their income.
Sector Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Holding across more sectors reduces the impact of any single industry downturn.
Geographic Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Exposure across geographies can reduce risk from any single country's economic conditions.
Fund Risk
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's overall risk profile, based on self-reported classifications where available.
Underlying Assets
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
What the fund actually holds — stocks, bonds, synthetics, or other funds — affects risk profile significantly.

See the full Risk analysis for both IWMY and RYLD — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.

View Plans →

Return: IWMY vs RYLD 45% of overall score

Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.

Criterion
IWMY
RYLD
Yield
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The current dividend yield, reflecting the annual income generated relative to fund price.
Yield Stability
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
How consistent the distribution amounts have been over time — critical for income investors who budget around payments.
Capital History
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's track record of price appreciation or depreciation, reflecting total return alongside income.
Distribution Frequency
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
How often the fund pays distributions — monthly payments are generally preferred by income investors.

See the full Return analysis for both IWMY and RYLD — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.

View Plans →

Our Review Methodology

Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.

We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?

Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both IWMY and RYLD are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Frequently Asked Questions: IWMY vs RYLD

Which has a lower expense ratio, IWMY or RYLD?

IWMY: Expense ratio is 1.05% which is high. Increased from 1.02% in the previous review.
RYLD: Total expense ratio is 0.60% which is reasonable for a covered call ETF.

Which fund has more assets under management, IWMY or RYLD?

IWMY: $100.32 Million in assets under management which is a very small fund. Fund has shrunk from $113 Million in the previous review - likely due to poor performance.
RYLD: $1.30 Billion in assets under management as of March 2026.

Which fund has been trading longer, IWMY or RYLD?

IWMY: Fund inception date was Oct 30th 2023 - approximately 2.3 years of history as of review date. In early October 2024 the fund moved from monthly to weekly distributions.
RYLD: Fund inception date was April 17th 2019 - over 6 years of history as of review date.

Who manages IWMY vs RYLD?

IWMY: Defiance ETFs surpassed $8 Billion in assets under management as of January 2026.
RYLD: Mirae Asset Global Investments - a South Korean financial services company - manages over $632 billion in assets worldwide.

Where can I see the full IWMY vs RYLD comparison with scores?

The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See the Full IWMY vs RYLD Comparison

The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.

Open Free Comparison Tool →

Free. No credit card required.

"As someone new to investing, this app is a game changer!"

— J. Cook, Alert Bay, BC 🇨🇦

"It is a great tool for tracking investing. It has been incredibly helpful for my husband and me."

— R. Savino, Brea, CA 🇺🇸

"I imagine it will continue to be invaluable as I begin personally managing some or all of my investments."

— D. Giesy, Mount Vernon, WA 🇺🇸