JEPQ vs QQQI: Income Fund Comparison

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF - US (JEPQ) and NEOS Nasdaq-100® High Income ETF - US (QQQI) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.

JEPQ: Expense ratio is 0.35 which is low for an options based fund. QQQI: Management fee and total annual fund operating expenses are 0.68%. JEPQ fund has been around since May 3rd 2022. QQQI fund inception date was Jan 30th 2024 - just over 2 years of history as of review date. Full Dependability and Return scores for both funds are available in the app.

JEPQ QQQI
Fund Name JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF - US NEOS Nasdaq-100® High Income ETF - US
Fund Type Index Based Fund Index Based Fund
Exchange NYSE/NASDAQ NYSE/NASDAQ
Last Reviewed 2025-10-30 2026-03-07
Author , Income Investing Analyst
JEPQ
QQQI
Overall Score
Dependability

🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription

Compare Performance — Free →

Fund Attributes: JEPQ vs QQQI 20% of overall score

Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.

Criterion
JEPQ
QQQI
Expense Ratio
4/5

Expense ratio is 0.35 which is low for an options based fund.

3/5

Management fee and total annual fund operating expenses are 0.68%.

Fund Company Size
5/5

JP Morgan has trillions under management.

5/5

NEOS Investments total ETF AUM is approximately $21.6 billion across all 19 funds as of 03/05/2026.

Fund History
4/5

Fund has been around since May 3rd 2022.

3/5

Fund inception date was Jan 30th 2024 - just over 2 years of history as of review date.

Fund AUM
5/5

34 Billion plus under management. One of the most popular income funds.

5/5

$9.015 Billion in assets under management as of March 2026. One of the largest NEOS funds.

Risk: JEPQ vs QQQI 35% of overall score

Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.

Criterion
JEPQ
QQQI
Volatility
4/5

Beta is a low 0.7 which is less volatile as the market.

3/5

Beta is 0.98 vs SPY (2024-02-09 to 2026-03-06) - slightly below the market. Short fund history limits precision of this calculation.

Lower volatility may indicate more stability — important for investors living off their income.
Sector Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Holding across more sectors reduces the impact of any single industry downturn.
Geographic Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Exposure across geographies can reduce risk from any single country's economic conditions.
Fund Risk
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's overall risk profile, based on self-reported classifications where available.
Underlying Assets
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
What the fund actually holds — stocks, bonds, synthetics, or other funds — affects risk profile significantly.

See the full Risk analysis for both JEPQ and QQQI — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.

View Plans →

Return: JEPQ vs QQQI 45% of overall score

Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.

Criterion
JEPQ
QQQI
Yield
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The current dividend yield, reflecting the annual income generated relative to fund price.
Yield Stability
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
How consistent the distribution amounts have been over time — critical for income investors who budget around payments.
Capital History
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's track record of price appreciation or depreciation, reflecting total return alongside income.
Distribution Frequency
4/5

Fund pays monthly.

4/5

Monthly distributions.

How often the fund pays distributions — monthly payments are generally preferred by income investors.

See the full Return analysis for both JEPQ and QQQI — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.

View Plans →

Our Review Methodology

Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.

We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?

Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both JEPQ and QQQI are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See our full scoring methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions: JEPQ vs QQQI

Which has a lower expense ratio, JEPQ or QQQI?

JEPQ: Expense ratio is 0.35 which is low for an options based fund.
QQQI: Management fee and total annual fund operating expenses are 0.68%.

Which fund has more assets under management, JEPQ or QQQI?

JEPQ: 34 Billion plus under management. One of the most popular income funds.
QQQI: $9.015 Billion in assets under management as of March 2026. One of the largest NEOS funds.

Which fund has been trading longer, JEPQ or QQQI?

JEPQ: Fund has been around since May 3rd 2022.
QQQI: Fund inception date was Jan 30th 2024 - just over 2 years of history as of review date.

Who manages JEPQ vs QQQI?

JEPQ: JP Morgan has trillions under management.
QQQI: NEOS Investments total ETF AUM is approximately $21.6 billion across all 19 funds as of 03/05/2026.

Where can I see the full JEPQ vs QQQI comparison with scores?

The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

What is the difference between JEPQ and QQQI?

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Expense ratio is 0.35 which is low for an options based fund. NEOS Nasdaq-100® High Income ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Management fee and total annual fund operating expenses are 0.68%. Full comparison including Dependability Score is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Which is better for income investors, JEPQ or QQQI?

JEPQ: Expense ratio is 0.35 which is low for an options based fund. Fund has been around since May 3rd 2022. QQQI: Management fee and total annual fund operating expenses are 0.68%. Fund inception date was Jan 30th 2024 - just over 2 years of history as of review date. Which scores higher on Dependability and Return is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Do JEPQ and QQQI pay monthly distributions?

JEPQ: Fund pays monthly. QQQI: Monthly distributions. Full yield and distribution stability scores for both funds are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See the Full JEPQ vs QQQI Comparison

The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.

Open Free Comparison Tool →

Free. No credit card required.

"As someone new to investing, this app is a game changer!"

— J. Cook, Alert Bay, BC 🇨🇦

"It is a great tool for tracking investing. It has been incredibly helpful for my husband and me."

— R. Savino, Brea, CA 🇺🇸

"I imagine it will continue to be invaluable as I begin personally managing some or all of my investments."

— D. Giesy, Mount Vernon, WA 🇺🇸