QDTE vs QYLD: Income Fund Comparison
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF - US (QDTE) and GlobalX Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF - US (QYLD) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.
Also see: QDTE individual review · QYLD individual review
QDTE: Gross expense ratio is 0.97% per the fund's official Fund Details table. QYLD: Total expense ratio is 0.60% which is reasonable for a covered call ETF. QDTE fund launched March 7 2024 - about 2.4 years old as of this review - rounds up to 3 years. QYLD fund inception date was Dec 11th 2013 - over 12 years of history as of review date. Full Dependability and Return scores for both funds are available in the app.
| QDTE | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF - US | GlobalX Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF - US |
| Fund Type | Index Based Fund | Index Based Fund |
| Exchange | NYSE/NASDAQ | NYSE/NASDAQ |
| Last Reviewed | Aug 17, 2026 | Mar 6, 2026 |
| Author | Adam Hyde, Income Investing Analyst | |
🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription
Compare Performance — Free →Fund Attributes: QDTE vs QYLD 20% of overall score
Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.
Gross expense ratio is 0.97% per the fund's official Fund Details table.
Total expense ratio is 0.60% which is reasonable for a covered call ETF.
Roundhill Investments surpassed $30 billion in total firm-wide AUM as of June 26 2026 per its official press release.
Mirae Asset Global Investments - a South Korean financial services company - manages over $632 billion in assets worldwide.
Fund launched March 7 2024 - about 2.4 years old as of this review - rounds up to 3 years.
Fund inception date was Dec 11th 2013 - over 12 years of history as of review date.
Fund AUM is $975.05 million per the fund's official Fund Details table.
$8.36 Billion in assets under management as of March 2026.
Risk: QDTE vs QYLD 35% of overall score
Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.
Beta vs SPY is 1.11 (period 2024-03-15 to 2026-08-15 - the fund's available history) - moderate market sensitivity. Standalone volatility from the price series is 17.97% annualized (weekly total returns) - low-to-moderate choppiness. Beta score (3) used as primary driver since standalone vol score (4) differs by only 1 point.
Beta is 0.63 vs SPY (2016-03-11 to 2026-03-06) which is significantly lower than the overall market.
See the full Risk analysis for both QDTE and QYLD — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.
View Plans →Return: QDTE vs QYLD 45% of overall score
Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.
Distribution history confirms weekly payment dates throughout 2024 - 2025 and 2026.
Monthly distributions.
See the full Return analysis for both QDTE and QYLD — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.
View Plans →Our Review Methodology
Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.
We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?
Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both QDTE and QYLD are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
See our full scoring methodology →
Frequently Asked Questions: QDTE vs QYLD
Which has a lower expense ratio, QDTE or QYLD?
QDTE: Gross expense ratio is 0.97% per the fund's official Fund Details table.
QYLD: Total expense ratio is 0.60% which is reasonable for a covered call ETF.
Which fund has more assets under management, QDTE or QYLD?
QDTE: Fund AUM is $975.05 million per the fund's official Fund Details table.
QYLD: $8.36 Billion in assets under management as of March 2026.
Which fund has been trading longer, QDTE or QYLD?
QDTE: Fund launched March 7 2024 - about 2.4 years old as of this review - rounds up to 3 years.
QYLD: Fund inception date was Dec 11th 2013 - over 12 years of history as of review date.
Who manages QDTE vs QYLD?
QDTE: Roundhill Investments surpassed $30 billion in total firm-wide AUM as of June 26 2026 per its official press release.
QYLD: Mirae Asset Global Investments - a South Korean financial services company - manages over $632 billion in assets worldwide.
Where can I see the full QDTE vs QYLD comparison with scores?
The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
What is the difference between QDTE and QYLD?
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Gross expense ratio is 0.97% per the fund's official Fund Details table. GlobalX Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Total expense ratio is 0.60% which is reasonable for a covered call ETF. Full comparison including Dependability Score is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
Which is better for income investors, QDTE or QYLD?
QDTE: Gross expense ratio is 0.97% per the fund's official Fund Details table. Fund launched March 7 2024 - about 2.4 years old as of this review - rounds up to 3 years. QYLD: Total expense ratio is 0.60% which is reasonable for a covered call ETF. Fund inception date was Dec 11th 2013 - over 12 years of history as of review date. Which scores higher on Dependability and Return is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
Do QDTE and QYLD pay monthly distributions?
QDTE: Distribution history confirms weekly payment dates throughout 2024 - 2025 and 2026. QYLD: Monthly distributions. Full yield and distribution stability scores for both funds are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
See the Full QDTE vs QYLD Comparison
The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.
Open Free Comparison Tool →Free. No credit card required.