QQQI vs QQQY: Income Fund Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100® High Income ETF - US (QQQI) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF - US (QQQY) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.

QQQI: Management fee and total annual fund operating expenses are 0.68%. QQQY: Expense ratio 1.01% - data as of 02/27/2026 QQQI fund inception date was Jan 30th 2024 - just over 2 years of history as of review date. QQQY fund inception 09/13/23 Full Dependability and Return scores for both funds are available in the app.

QQQI QQQY
Fund Name NEOS Nasdaq-100® High Income ETF - US Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF - US
Fund Type Index Based Fund Index Based Fund
Exchange NYSE/NASDAQ NYSE/NASDAQ
Last Reviewed 2026-03-07 2026-03-02
Author , Income Investing Analyst
QQQI
QQQY
Overall Score
Dependability

🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription

Compare Performance — Free →

Fund Attributes: QQQI vs QQQY 20% of overall score

Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.

Criterion
QQQI
QQQY
Expense Ratio
3/5

Management fee and total annual fund operating expenses are 0.68%.

1/5

Expense ratio 1.01% - data as of 02/27/2026

Fund Company Size
5/5

NEOS Investments total ETF AUM is approximately $21.6 billion across all 19 funds as of 03/05/2026.

4/5

Defiance AUM passed $8B as of 26 January 2026

Fund History
3/5

Fund inception date was Jan 30th 2024 - just over 2 years of history as of review date.

3/5

Fund inception 09/13/23

Fund AUM
5/5

$9.015 Billion in assets under management as of March 2026. One of the largest NEOS funds.

1/5

Net assets $178.60M as of 02/27/2026

Risk: QQQI vs QQQY 35% of overall score

Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.

Criterion
QQQI
QQQY
Volatility
3/5

Beta is 0.98 vs SPY (2024-02-09 to 2026-03-06) - slightly below the market. Short fund history limits precision of this calculation.

1/5

Beta -0.0727 vs SPY - weekly - 2023-09-22 to 2026-03-02 - standalone volatility ~113.56% annualized (weekly returns) - extremely high price choppiness

Lower volatility may indicate more stability — important for investors living off their income.
Sector Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Holding across more sectors reduces the impact of any single industry downturn.
Geographic Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Exposure across geographies can reduce risk from any single country's economic conditions.
Fund Risk
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's overall risk profile, based on self-reported classifications where available.
Underlying Assets
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
What the fund actually holds — stocks, bonds, synthetics, or other funds — affects risk profile significantly.

See the full Risk analysis for both QQQI and QQQY — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.

View Plans →

Return: QQQI vs QQQY 45% of overall score

Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.

Criterion
QQQI
QQQY
Yield
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The current dividend yield, reflecting the annual income generated relative to fund price.
Yield Stability
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
How consistent the distribution amounts have been over time — critical for income investors who budget around payments.
Capital History
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's track record of price appreciation or depreciation, reflecting total return alongside income.
Distribution Frequency
4/5

Monthly distributions.

5/5

Distribution frequency weekly - payable as of 02/27/2026

How often the fund pays distributions — monthly payments are generally preferred by income investors.

See the full Return analysis for both QQQI and QQQY — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.

View Plans →

Our Review Methodology

Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.

We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?

Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both QQQI and QQQY are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See our full scoring methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions: QQQI vs QQQY

Which has a lower expense ratio, QQQI or QQQY?

QQQI: Management fee and total annual fund operating expenses are 0.68%.
QQQY: Expense ratio 1.01% - data as of 02/27/2026

Which fund has more assets under management, QQQI or QQQY?

QQQI: $9.015 Billion in assets under management as of March 2026. One of the largest NEOS funds.
QQQY: Net assets $178.60M as of 02/27/2026

Which fund has been trading longer, QQQI or QQQY?

QQQI: Fund inception date was Jan 30th 2024 - just over 2 years of history as of review date.
QQQY: Fund inception 09/13/23

Who manages QQQI vs QQQY?

QQQI: NEOS Investments total ETF AUM is approximately $21.6 billion across all 19 funds as of 03/05/2026.
QQQY: Defiance AUM passed $8B as of 26 January 2026

Where can I see the full QQQI vs QQQY comparison with scores?

The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

What is the difference between QQQI and QQQY?

NEOS Nasdaq-100® High Income ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Management fee and total annual fund operating expenses are 0.68%. Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Expense ratio 1.01% - data as of 02/27/2026. Full comparison including Dependability Score is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Which is better for income investors, QQQI or QQQY?

QQQI: Management fee and total annual fund operating expenses are 0.68%. Fund inception date was Jan 30th 2024 - just over 2 years of history as of review date. QQQY: Expense ratio 1.01% - data as of 02/27/2026. Fund inception 09/13/23. Which scores higher on Dependability and Return is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Do QQQI and QQQY pay monthly distributions?

QQQI: Monthly distributions. QQQY: Distribution frequency weekly - payable as of 02/27/2026. Full yield and distribution stability scores for both funds are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See the Full QQQI vs QQQY Comparison

The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.

Open Free Comparison Tool →

Free. No credit card required.

"As someone new to investing, this app is a game changer!"

— J. Cook, Alert Bay, BC 🇨🇦

"It is a great tool for tracking investing. It has been incredibly helpful for my husband and me."

— R. Savino, Brea, CA 🇺🇸

"I imagine it will continue to be invaluable as I begin personally managing some or all of my investments."

— D. Giesy, Mount Vernon, WA 🇺🇸