SCHD vs XYLG: Income Fund Comparison
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF - US (SCHD) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call and Growth ETF - US (XYLG) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.
Also see: SCHD individual review · XYLG individual review
| SCHD | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF - US | Global X S&P 500 Covered Call and Growth ETF - US |
| Fund Type | Index Based Fund | Index Based Fund |
| Exchange | NYSE/NASDAQ | NYSE/NASDAQ |
| Last Reviewed | 2025-12-15 | 2025-06-04 |
🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription
Compare Performance — Free →Fund Attributes: SCHD vs XYLG 20% of overall score
Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.
One of the lowest MER's you'll find at 0.06%.
MER is 0.35%. This is low for a covered call fund.
Schwab has a jaw dropping 10 Trillion in assets under management.
Mirae Global X has more than 40 Billion under management.
Oct 20th 2011 was the fund start date.
Fund inception date was Sept 18 2020.
72 Billion in this fund.
53 Million net assets invested in this fund.
Risk: SCHD vs XYLG 35% of overall score
Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.
See the full Risk analysis for both SCHD and XYLG — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.
View Plans →Return: SCHD vs XYLG 45% of overall score
Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.
See the full Return analysis for both SCHD and XYLG — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.
View Plans →Our Review Methodology
Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.
We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?
Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both SCHD and XYLG are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
Frequently Asked Questions: SCHD vs XYLG
Which has a lower expense ratio, SCHD or XYLG?
SCHD: One of the lowest MER's you'll find at 0.06%.
XYLG: MER is 0.35%. This is low for a covered call fund.
Which fund has more assets under management, SCHD or XYLG?
SCHD: 72 Billion in this fund.
XYLG: 53 Million net assets invested in this fund.
Which fund has been trading longer, SCHD or XYLG?
SCHD: Oct 20th 2011 was the fund start date.
XYLG: Fund inception date was Sept 18 2020.
Who manages SCHD vs XYLG?
SCHD: Schwab has a jaw dropping 10 Trillion in assets under management.
XYLG: Mirae Global X has more than 40 Billion under management.
Where can I see the full SCHD vs XYLG comparison with scores?
The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
See the Full SCHD vs XYLG Comparison
The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.
Open Free Comparison Tool →Free. No credit card required.