UMAX.TO vs HUTE.TO: Income Fund Comparison

HamiltonUtilities YIELD MAXIMIZER™ ETF - Canada (UMAX.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF - Canada (HUTE.TO) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.

UMAX.TO: MER is 0.79% as per the ETF Facts document (August 2025). HUTE.TO: Management expense ratio is 2.25% - high due to the leverage costs. UMAX.TO fund started June 14th 2023 - approximately 2 years and 9 months old. HUTE.TO inception date was October 25 2022. Full Dependability and Return scores for both funds are available in the app.

UMAX.TO HUTE.TO
Fund Name HamiltonUtilities YIELD MAXIMIZER™ ETF - Canada Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF - Canada
Fund Type Sector Based Fund - Utilities Sector Based Fund - Utilities
Exchange TSX TSX
Last Reviewed 2026-03-07 2025-07-30
Author , Income Investing Analyst
UMAX.TO
HUTE.TO
Overall Score
Dependability

🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription

Compare Performance — Free →

Fund Attributes: UMAX.TO vs HUTE.TO 20% of overall score

Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.

Criterion
UMAX.TO
HUTE.TO
Expense Ratio
2/5

MER is 0.79% as per the ETF Facts document (August 2025).

1/5

Management expense ratio is 2.25% - high due to the leverage costs.

Fund Company Size
5/5

Hamilton ETFs has over $13 billion in assets under management.

4/5

Harvest has over $7 billion in assets under management.

Fund History
3/5

Fund started June 14th 2023 - approximately 2 years and 9 months old.

3/5

Inception date was October 25 2022.

Fund AUM
5/5

Over $1.19 billion in assets in this fund as at March 5 2026.

1/5

About $50 million in assets under management - a small fund.

Risk: UMAX.TO vs HUTE.TO 35% of overall score

Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.

Criterion
UMAX.TO
HUTE.TO
Volatility
5/5

Beta of 0.21 vs SPY over the fund's history (2023-06-23 to 2026-03-07) - very low market sensitivity. Standalone annualized volatility of 8.91% (weekly total returns) is very low - standalone score used since |beta| < 0.6.

5/5

According to portfolio visualizer the beta of the fund is 0.4 which is low volatility.

Lower volatility may indicate more stability — important for investors living off their income.
Sector Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Holding across more sectors reduces the impact of any single industry downturn.
Geographic Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Exposure across geographies can reduce risk from any single country's economic conditions.
Fund Risk
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's overall risk profile, based on self-reported classifications where available.
Underlying Assets
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
What the fund actually holds — stocks, bonds, synthetics, or other funds — affects risk profile significantly.

See the full Risk analysis for both UMAX.TO and HUTE.TO — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.

View Plans →

Return: UMAX.TO vs HUTE.TO 45% of overall score

Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.

Criterion
UMAX.TO
HUTE.TO
Yield
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The current dividend yield, reflecting the annual income generated relative to fund price.
Yield Stability
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
How consistent the distribution amounts have been over time — critical for income investors who budget around payments.
Capital History
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's track record of price appreciation or depreciation, reflecting total return alongside income.
Distribution Frequency
4/5

Monthly distributions confirmed by distribution history.

4/5

Pays monthly.

How often the fund pays distributions — monthly payments are generally preferred by income investors.

See the full Return analysis for both UMAX.TO and HUTE.TO — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.

View Plans →

Our Review Methodology

Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.

We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?

Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both UMAX.TO and HUTE.TO are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See our full scoring methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions: UMAX.TO vs HUTE.TO

Which has a lower expense ratio, UMAX.TO or HUTE.TO?

UMAX.TO: MER is 0.79% as per the ETF Facts document (August 2025).
HUTE.TO: Management expense ratio is 2.25% - high due to the leverage costs.

Which fund has more assets under management, UMAX.TO or HUTE.TO?

UMAX.TO: Over $1.19 billion in assets in this fund as at March 5 2026.
HUTE.TO: About $50 million in assets under management - a small fund.

Which fund has been trading longer, UMAX.TO or HUTE.TO?

UMAX.TO: Fund started June 14th 2023 - approximately 2 years and 9 months old.
HUTE.TO: Inception date was October 25 2022.

Who manages UMAX.TO vs HUTE.TO?

UMAX.TO: Hamilton ETFs has over $13 billion in assets under management.
HUTE.TO: Harvest has over $7 billion in assets under management.

Where can I see the full UMAX.TO vs HUTE.TO comparison with scores?

The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

What is the difference between UMAX.TO and HUTE.TO?

HamiltonUtilities YIELD MAXIMIZER™ ETF - Canada is a Sector Based Fund - Utilities. MER is 0.79% as per the ETF Facts document (August 2025). Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF - Canada is a Sector Based Fund - Utilities. Management expense ratio is 2.25% - high due to the leverage costs. Full comparison including Dependability Score is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Which is better for income investors, UMAX.TO or HUTE.TO?

UMAX.TO: MER is 0.79% as per the ETF Facts document (August 2025). Fund started June 14th 2023 - approximately 2 years and 9 months old. HUTE.TO: Management expense ratio is 2.25% - high due to the leverage costs. Inception date was October 25 2022. Which scores higher on Dependability and Return is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Do UMAX.TO and HUTE.TO pay monthly distributions?

UMAX.TO: Monthly distributions confirmed by distribution history. HUTE.TO: Pays monthly. Full yield and distribution stability scores for both funds are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See the Full UMAX.TO vs HUTE.TO Comparison

The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.

Open Free Comparison Tool →

Free. No credit card required.

"As someone new to investing, this app is a game changer!"

— J. Cook, Alert Bay, BC 🇨🇦

"It is a great tool for tracking investing. It has been incredibly helpful for my husband and me."

— R. Savino, Brea, CA 🇺🇸

"I imagine it will continue to be invaluable as I begin personally managing some or all of my investments."

— D. Giesy, Mount Vernon, WA 🇺🇸