USCL.TO vs ESPX.TO: Income Fund Comparison
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF - Canada (USCL.TO) and Evolve S&P 500 Enhanced Yield Fund - Canada (ESPX.TO) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.
Also see: USCL.TO individual review · ESPX.TO individual review
USCL.TO: MER is 1.65% which is high. ESPX.TO: MER is 0.68% for the ETF. They also have a mutual fund version which is 1.8% MER. USCL.TO the fund was formed July 5 2023. ESPX.TO fund started Jan 9 2023 Full Dependability and Return scores for both funds are available in the app.
| USCL.TO | ESPX.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF - Canada | Evolve S&P 500 Enhanced Yield Fund - Canada |
| Fund Type | Index Based Fund | Index Based Fund |
| Exchange | TSX | TSX |
| Last Reviewed | 2025-12-09 | 2025-08-25 |
| Author | Adam Hyde, Income Investing Analyst | |
🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription
Compare Performance — Free →Fund Attributes: USCL.TO vs ESPX.TO 20% of overall score
Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.
MER is 1.65% which is high.
MER is 0.68% for the ETF. They also have a mutual fund version which is 1.8% MER.
Has over $100 billion in assets under management worldwide.
Evolve has over $7 Billion in Assets Under Management.
The fund was formed July 5 2023.
Fund started Jan 9 2023
$260 Million plus under management for USCL and $400 Million under management for USCC which is the non-leveraged version. Combined is over $660 Million.
$285 Million in AUM in this fund.
Risk: USCL.TO vs ESPX.TO 35% of overall score
Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.
According to Portfoliovisualizer the beta is low for this fund at 0.9 which is good.
According to portfolio visualizer the beta is 0.88.
See the full Risk analysis for both USCL.TO and ESPX.TO — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.
View Plans →Return: USCL.TO vs ESPX.TO 45% of overall score
Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.
Monthly distributions.
Pays monthly.
See the full Return analysis for both USCL.TO and ESPX.TO — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.
View Plans →Our Review Methodology
Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.
We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?
Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both USCL.TO and ESPX.TO are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
See our full scoring methodology →
Frequently Asked Questions: USCL.TO vs ESPX.TO
Which has a lower expense ratio, USCL.TO or ESPX.TO?
USCL.TO: MER is 1.65% which is high.
ESPX.TO: MER is 0.68% for the ETF. They also have a mutual fund version which is 1.8% MER.
Which fund has more assets under management, USCL.TO or ESPX.TO?
USCL.TO: $260 Million plus under management for USCL and $400 Million under management for USCC which is the non-leveraged version. Combined is over $660 Million.
ESPX.TO: $285 Million in AUM in this fund.
Which fund has been trading longer, USCL.TO or ESPX.TO?
USCL.TO: The fund was formed July 5 2023.
ESPX.TO: Fund started Jan 9 2023
Who manages USCL.TO vs ESPX.TO?
USCL.TO: Has over $100 billion in assets under management worldwide.
ESPX.TO: Evolve has over $7 Billion in Assets Under Management.
Where can I see the full USCL.TO vs ESPX.TO comparison with scores?
The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
What is the difference between USCL.TO and ESPX.TO?
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF - Canada is a Index Based Fund. MER is 1.65% which is high. Evolve S&P 500 Enhanced Yield Fund - Canada is a Index Based Fund. MER is 0.68% for the ETF. They also have a mutual fund version which is 1.8% MER. Full comparison including Dependability Score is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
Which is better for income investors, USCL.TO or ESPX.TO?
USCL.TO: MER is 1.65% which is high. The fund was formed July 5 2023. ESPX.TO: MER is 0.68% for the ETF. They also have a mutual fund version which is 1.8% MER. Fund started Jan 9 2023. Which scores higher on Dependability and Return is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
Do USCL.TO and ESPX.TO pay monthly distributions?
USCL.TO: Monthly distributions. ESPX.TO: Pays monthly. Full yield and distribution stability scores for both funds are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.
See the Full USCL.TO vs ESPX.TO Comparison
The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.
Open Free Comparison Tool →Free. No credit card required.
