XYLD vs PBP: Income Fund Comparison

GlobalX S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF - US (PBP) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.

XYLD: MER is 0.6%. PBP: Expense ratio is 0.29% which is low. XYLD fund started June 21st 2013 and is one of the original covered call index funds. PBP fund was established Dec 20th 2007. Full Dependability and Return scores for both funds are available in the app.

XYLD PBP
Fund Name GlobalX S&P 500 Covered Call ETF Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF - US
Fund Type Index Based Fund Index Based Fund
Exchange NYSE/NASDAQ NYSE/NASDAQ
Last Reviewed 2025-12-24 2025-11-13
Author , Income Investing Analyst
XYLD
PBP
Overall Score
Dependability

🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription

Compare Performance — Free →

Fund Attributes: XYLD vs PBP 20% of overall score

Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.

Criterion
XYLD
PBP
Expense Ratio
3/5

MER is 0.6%.

4/5

Expense ratio is 0.29% which is low.

Fund Company Size
5/5

Mirae Asset Global Investments - a South Korean financial services company - manages over US$200 billion in assets worldwide.

5/5

USD $1.84 trillion in assets

Fund History
5/5

Fund started June 21st 2013 and is one of the original covered call index funds.

5/5

fund was established Dec 20th 2007.

Fund AUM
5/5

3.1 billion in this fund.

3/5

Over 300 Million in this fund.

Risk: XYLD vs PBP 35% of overall score

Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.

Criterion
XYLD
PBP
Volatility
5/5

Beta is 0.41 which is lower than the S&P 500 itself.

5/5

Volatility of this fund is low at 0.59 according to portfolio visualizer.

Lower volatility may indicate more stability — important for investors living off their income.
Sector Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Holding across more sectors reduces the impact of any single industry downturn.
Geographic Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Exposure across geographies can reduce risk from any single country's economic conditions.
Fund Risk
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's overall risk profile, based on self-reported classifications where available.
Underlying Assets
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
What the fund actually holds — stocks, bonds, synthetics, or other funds — affects risk profile significantly.

See the full Risk analysis for both XYLD and PBP — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.

View Plans →

Return: XYLD vs PBP 45% of overall score

Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.

Criterion
XYLD
PBP
Yield
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The current dividend yield, reflecting the annual income generated relative to fund price.
Yield Stability
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
How consistent the distribution amounts have been over time — critical for income investors who budget around payments.
Capital History
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's track record of price appreciation or depreciation, reflecting total return alongside income.
Distribution Frequency
4/5

Pays monthly.

4/5

Pays monthly distributions.

How often the fund pays distributions — monthly payments are generally preferred by income investors.

See the full Return analysis for both XYLD and PBP — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.

View Plans →

Our Review Methodology

Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.

We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?

Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both XYLD and PBP are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See our full scoring methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions: XYLD vs PBP

Which has a lower expense ratio, XYLD or PBP?

XYLD: MER is 0.6%.
PBP: Expense ratio is 0.29% which is low.

Which fund has more assets under management, XYLD or PBP?

XYLD: 3.1 billion in this fund.
PBP: Over 300 Million in this fund.

Which fund has been trading longer, XYLD or PBP?

XYLD: Fund started June 21st 2013 and is one of the original covered call index funds.
PBP: fund was established Dec 20th 2007.

Who manages XYLD vs PBP?

XYLD: Mirae Asset Global Investments - a South Korean financial services company - manages over US$200 billion in assets worldwide.
PBP: USD $1.84 trillion in assets

Where can I see the full XYLD vs PBP comparison with scores?

The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

What is the difference between XYLD and PBP?

GlobalX S&P 500 Covered Call ETF is a Index Based Fund. MER is 0.6%. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Expense ratio is 0.29% which is low. Full comparison including Dependability Score is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Which is better for income investors, XYLD or PBP?

XYLD: MER is 0.6%. Fund started June 21st 2013 and is one of the original covered call index funds. PBP: Expense ratio is 0.29% which is low. fund was established Dec 20th 2007. Which scores higher on Dependability and Return is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Do XYLD and PBP pay monthly distributions?

XYLD: Pays monthly. PBP: Pays monthly distributions. Full yield and distribution stability scores for both funds are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See the Full XYLD vs PBP Comparison

The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.

Open Free Comparison Tool →

Free. No credit card required.

"As someone new to investing, this app is a game changer!"

— J. Cook, Alert Bay, BC 🇨🇦

"It is a great tool for tracking investing. It has been incredibly helpful for my husband and me."

— R. Savino, Brea, CA 🇺🇸

"I imagine it will continue to be invaluable as I begin personally managing some or all of my investments."

— D. Giesy, Mount Vernon, WA 🇺🇸