ISPY vs FEPI: Income Fund Comparison

Proshares S&P 500 High Income ETF - US (ISPY) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF - US (FEPI) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.

ISPY: Expense ratio is 0.56% FEPI: Total expense ratio is 0.65%. ISPY inception date December 18 2023 - approximately 2.3 years of history FEPI inception date was October 11 2023. As of March 6 2026 the fund is approximately 2 years and 4 months old. Full Dependability and Return scores for both funds are available in the app.

ISPY FEPI
Fund Name Proshares S&P 500 High Income ETF - US REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF - US
Fund Type Index Based Fund Sector Based Fund - Information Technology
Exchange NYSE/NASDAQ NYSE/NASDAQ
Last Reviewed 2026-04-07 2026-03-06
Author , Income Investing Analyst
ISPY
FEPI
Overall Score
Dependability

🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription

Compare Performance — Free →

Fund Attributes: ISPY vs FEPI 20% of overall score

Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.

Criterion
ISPY
FEPI
Expense Ratio
3/5

Expense ratio is 0.56%

3/5

Total expense ratio is 0.65%.

Fund Company Size
5/5

ProShares has surpassed $100 billion in assets under management

5/5

Over $10 billion in assets under management for Rex Financial.

Fund History
3/5

Inception date December 18 2023 - approximately 2.3 years of history

3/5

Inception date was October 11 2023. As of March 6 2026 the fund is approximately 2 years and 4 months old.

Fund AUM
5/5

Fund AUM approximately $1.14 billion as of February 28 2026

3/5

Fund AUM is approximately $591.6 million as of March 4 2026.

Risk: ISPY vs FEPI 35% of overall score

Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.

Criterion
ISPY
FEPI
Volatility
4/5

Calculation result: beta 0.91 vs SPY (period 2023-12-29 to 2026-03-28) - standalone volatility 12.99% annualized (weekly returns) - low-to-moderate price variability

3/5

Beta is 1.12 vs SPY over the available price series (October 2023 to March 2026). Standalone annualized volatility is 21.39% (weekly total returns). Both measures score 3.

Lower volatility may indicate more stability — important for investors living off their income.
Sector Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Holding across more sectors reduces the impact of any single industry downturn.
Geographic Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Exposure across geographies can reduce risk from any single country's economic conditions.
Fund Risk
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's overall risk profile, based on self-reported classifications where available.
Underlying Assets
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
What the fund actually holds — stocks, bonds, synthetics, or other funds — affects risk profile significantly.

See the full Risk analysis for both ISPY and FEPI — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.

View Plans →

Return: ISPY vs FEPI 45% of overall score

Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.

Criterion
ISPY
FEPI
Yield
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The current dividend yield, reflecting the annual income generated relative to fund price.
Yield Stability
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
How consistent the distribution amounts have been over time — critical for income investors who budget around payments.
Capital History
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's track record of price appreciation or depreciation, reflecting total return alongside income.
Distribution Frequency
4/5

Monthly distributions

4/5

Fund pays monthly distributions.

How often the fund pays distributions — monthly payments are generally preferred by income investors.

See the full Return analysis for both ISPY and FEPI — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.

View Plans →

Our Review Methodology

Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.

We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?

Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both ISPY and FEPI are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See our full scoring methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions: ISPY vs FEPI

Which has a lower expense ratio, ISPY or FEPI?

ISPY: Expense ratio is 0.56%
FEPI: Total expense ratio is 0.65%.

Which fund has more assets under management, ISPY or FEPI?

ISPY: Fund AUM approximately $1.14 billion as of February 28 2026
FEPI: Fund AUM is approximately $591.6 million as of March 4 2026.

Which fund has been trading longer, ISPY or FEPI?

ISPY: Inception date December 18 2023 - approximately 2.3 years of history
FEPI: Inception date was October 11 2023. As of March 6 2026 the fund is approximately 2 years and 4 months old.

Who manages ISPY vs FEPI?

ISPY: ProShares has surpassed $100 billion in assets under management
FEPI: Over $10 billion in assets under management for Rex Financial.

Where can I see the full ISPY vs FEPI comparison with scores?

The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

What is the difference between ISPY and FEPI?

Proshares S&P 500 High Income ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. Expense ratio is 0.56%. REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF - US is a Sector Based Fund - Information Technology. Total expense ratio is 0.65%. Full comparison including Dependability Score is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Which is better for income investors, ISPY or FEPI?

ISPY: Expense ratio is 0.56%. Inception date December 18 2023 - approximately 2.3 years of history. FEPI: Total expense ratio is 0.65%. Inception date was October 11 2023. As of March 6 2026 the fund is approximately 2 years and 4 months old. Which scores higher on Dependability and Return is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Do ISPY and FEPI pay monthly distributions?

ISPY: Monthly distributions. FEPI: Fund pays monthly distributions. Full yield and distribution stability scores for both funds are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See the Full ISPY vs FEPI Comparison

The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.

Open Free Comparison Tool →

Free. No credit card required.

"As someone new to investing, this app is a game changer!"

— J. Cook, Alert Bay, BC 🇨🇦

"It is a great tool for tracking investing. It has been incredibly helpful for my husband and me."

— R. Savino, Brea, CA 🇺🇸

"I imagine it will continue to be invaluable as I begin personally managing some or all of my investments."

— D. Giesy, Mount Vernon, WA 🇺🇸