ITWO vs IWMW: Income Fund Comparison

ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF - US (ITWO) and iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite - US (IWMW) are both income-focused funds. Below is our independent side-by-side review using the Dependable Income Investing 13-factor scoring system — designed specifically for income investors seeking reliable, sustainable distributions.

ITWO: MER is 0.55% IWMW: Expense ratio is 0.39 percent as of the current prospectus which is low for an options ETF. ITWO fund inception date was September 4th 2024. IWMW the fund launched March 14 2024 so it has less than two years of operating history. Full Dependability and Return scores for both funds are available in the app.

ITWO IWMW
Fund Name ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF - US iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite - US
Fund Type Index Based Fund Index Based Fund
Exchange NYSE/NASDAQ NYSE/NASDAQ
Last Reviewed 2025-10-04 2025-07-10
Author , Income Investing Analyst
ITWO
IWMW
Overall Score
Dependability

🔒 Full scores available — with Premium subscription

Compare Performance — Free →

Fund Attributes: ITWO vs IWMW 20% of overall score

Fund Attributes cover the foundational characteristics of each fund: cost, company backing, track record, and size. These factors reflect stability and cost-efficiency for long-term income investors.

Criterion
ITWO
IWMW
Expense Ratio
3/5

MER is 0.55%

4/5

Expense ratio is 0.39 percent as of the current prospectus which is low for an options ETF.

Fund Company Size
5/5

Proshares manages over 95 Billion in Assets.

5/5

The total assets managed by iShares are in the trillions.

Fund History
2/5

Fund inception date was September 4th 2024.

2/5

The fund launched March 14 2024 so it has less than two years of operating history.

Fund AUM
5/5

Fund has 1.62 Billion AUM

1/5

Net assets are $25 million as of July 2025 which is small for an ETF.

Risk: ITWO vs IWMW 35% of overall score

Risk factors evaluate how each fund manages volatility, diversification, and the nature of its underlying assets — critical considerations for income investors who prioritise capital preservation.

Criterion
ITWO
IWMW
Volatility
1/5

Fund is much more volatile than the S&P500 index.

3/5

Similar to the market.

Lower volatility may indicate more stability — important for investors living off their income.
Sector Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Holding across more sectors reduces the impact of any single industry downturn.
Geographic Diversification
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
Exposure across geographies can reduce risk from any single country's economic conditions.
Fund Risk
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's overall risk profile, based on self-reported classifications where available.
Underlying Assets
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
What the fund actually holds — stocks, bonds, synthetics, or other funds — affects risk profile significantly.

See the full Risk analysis for both ITWO and IWMW — volatility ratings, diversification scores, and analyst notes.

View Plans →

Return: ITWO vs IWMW 45% of overall score

Return factors assess income generation quality: current yield, distribution consistency, price history, and payment frequency. This is the most heavily weighted category for income investors.

Criterion
ITWO
IWMW
Yield
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The current dividend yield, reflecting the annual income generated relative to fund price.
Yield Stability
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
How consistent the distribution amounts have been over time — critical for income investors who budget around payments.
Capital History
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
████████████████████████
🔒 Full analysis in app
The fund's track record of price appreciation or depreciation, reflecting total return alongside income.
Distribution Frequency
4/5

Fund pays monthly.

4/5

The fund pays distributions monthly.

How often the fund pays distributions — monthly payments are generally preferred by income investors.

See the full Return analysis for both ITWO and IWMW — yield ratings, distribution consistency scores, and capital history.

View Plans →

Our Review Methodology

Every fund reviewed on Dependable Income Investing is scored using our 13-factor Fund Report Card, organised into three weighted categories: Fund Attributes (20%), Risk (35%), and Return (45%). Each criterion is rated 1–5 by our analysts based on publicly available fund data.

We also calculate a Dependability Score — a weighted composite of six income-specific factors ranked by importance for retirement income investors: Yield Stability, Yield, Volatility, Capital History, Fund Risk, and Underlying Assets. This score answers the question income investors care about most: can I depend on this fund to pay me reliably?

Full scores, ratings, and analyst notes for both ITWO and IWMW are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See our full scoring methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions: ITWO vs IWMW

Which has a lower expense ratio, ITWO or IWMW?

ITWO: MER is 0.55%
IWMW: Expense ratio is 0.39 percent as of the current prospectus which is low for an options ETF.

Which fund has more assets under management, ITWO or IWMW?

ITWO: Fund has 1.62 Billion AUM
IWMW: Net assets are $25 million as of July 2025 which is small for an ETF.

Which fund has been trading longer, ITWO or IWMW?

ITWO: Fund inception date was September 4th 2024.
IWMW: The fund launched March 14 2024 so it has less than two years of operating history.

Who manages ITWO vs IWMW?

ITWO: Proshares manages over 95 Billion in Assets.
IWMW: The total assets managed by iShares are in the trillions.

Where can I see the full ITWO vs IWMW comparison with scores?

The complete side-by-side comparison — including all Risk and Return scores, analyst notes, Overall Score, and Dependability Score for both funds — is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

What is the difference between ITWO and IWMW?

ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF - US is a Index Based Fund. MER is 0.55%. iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite - US is a Index Based Fund. Expense ratio is 0.39 percent as of the current prospectus which is low for an options ETF. Full comparison including Dependability Score is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Which is better for income investors, ITWO or IWMW?

ITWO: MER is 0.55%. Fund inception date was September 4th 2024. IWMW: Expense ratio is 0.39 percent as of the current prospectus which is low for an options ETF. The fund launched March 14 2024 so it has less than two years of operating history. Which scores higher on Dependability and Return is available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

Do ITWO and IWMW pay monthly distributions?

ITWO: Fund pays monthly. IWMW: The fund pays distributions monthly. Full yield and distribution stability scores for both funds are available in the Dependable Income Investing app.

See the Full ITWO vs IWMW Comparison

The Dependable Income Investing app gives you the complete picture: all 13 scoring factors for both funds, Risk and Return analyst notes, Dependability Scores, and tools to compare any income fund side by side.

Open Free Comparison Tool →

Free. No credit card required.

"As someone new to investing, this app is a game changer!"

— J. Cook, Alert Bay, BC 🇨🇦

"It is a great tool for tracking investing. It has been incredibly helpful for my husband and me."

— R. Savino, Brea, CA 🇺🇸

"I imagine it will continue to be invaluable as I begin personally managing some or all of my investments."

— D. Giesy, Mount Vernon, WA 🇺🇸